Overview
Teaching: 15 min
Exercises: 0 minQuestions
How can I perform the same actions on many different files?
Objectives
Write a loop that applies one or more commands separately to each file in a set of files.
Trace the values taken on by a loop variable during execution of the loop.
Explain the difference between a variable’s name and its value.
Explain why spaces and some punctuation characters shouldn’t be used in file names.
Demonstrate how to see what commands have recently been executed.
Re-run recently executed commands without retyping them.
Loops are key to productivity improvements through automation as they allow us to execute commands repetitively. Similar to wildcards and tab completion, using loops also reduces the amount of typing (and typing mistakes).
Let’s do something on all the images.
We would like to modify these files, but also save a version of the original files, naming the copies
original-1411.jpg
and so on.
We can’t use:
$ cp *.jpg original-*.jpg
because that would expand to:
$ cp 1141.dat 1142.dat original-*.jpg
This wouldn’t back up our files, instead we get an error:
cp: target `original-*.jpg' is not a directory
This problem arises when cp
receives more than two inputs. When this happens, it
expects the last input to be a directory where it can copy all the files it was passed.
Since there is no directory named original-*.jpg
in the pictures
directory we get an
error.
Instead, we can use a loop to do some operation once for each thing in a list. Here’s a simple example that displays the first three lines of each file in turn:
$ for filename in 1411.jpg 1412.jpg
> do
> echo $filename
> done
When the shell sees the keyword for
,
it knows to repeat a command (or group of commands) once for each thing in
a list.
For each iteration,
the name of the each thing is sequentially assigned to
the variable and the commands inside the loop are executed before moving on to
the next thing in the list.
Inside the loop,
we call for the variable’s value by putting $
in front of it.
The $
tells the shell interpreter to treat
the variable as a variable name and substitute its value in its place,
rather than treat it as text or an external command.
In this example, the list is two filenames: 1411.jpg
and 1412.jpg
.
Each time the loop iterates, it will assign a file name to the variable filename
and run the head
command.
The first time through the loop,
$filename
is 1141.jpg
.
The interpreter runs the command echo
on 1141.jpg
,
and the prints the string 1141.jpg
.
For the second iteration, $filename
becomes
1142.jpg
. This time, the shell runs echo
on 1142.jpg
and prints 1142.jpg
.
Since the list was only two items, the shell exits the for
loop.
When using variables it is also
possible to put the names into curly braces to clearly delimit the variable
name: $filename
is equivalent to ${filename}
, but is different from
${file}name
. You may find this notation in other people’s programs.
Follow the Prompt
The shell prompt changes from
$
to>
and back again as we were typing in our loop. The second prompt,>
, is different to remind us that we haven’t finished typing a complete command yet. A semicolon,;
, can be used to separate two commands written on a single line.
Same Symbols, Different Meanings
Here we see
>
being used a shell prompt, whereas>
is also used to redirect output. Similarly,$
is used as a shell prompt, but, as we saw earler, it is also used to ask the shell to get the value of a variable.If the shell prints
>
or$
then it expects you to type something, and the symbol is a prompt.If you type
>
or$
yourself, it is an instruction from you that the shell to redirect output or get the value of a variable.
We have called the variable in this loop filename
in order to make its purpose clearer to human readers.
The shell itself doesn’t care what the variable is called;
if we wrote this loop as:
for x in 1141.jpg 1142.jpg
do
echo $x
done
or:
for temperature in 1141.jpg 1142.jpg
do
echo $temperature
done
it would work exactly the same way.
Don’t do this.
Programs are only useful if people can understand them,
so meaningless names (like x
) or misleading names (like temperature
)
increase the odds that the program won’t do what its readers think it does.
Spaces in Names
Whitespace is used to separate the elements on the list that we are going to loop over. If on the list we have elements with whitespace we need to quote those elements and our variable when using it. Suppose our data files are named:
red dragon.dat purple unicorn.dat
We need to use
for filename in "red dragon.dat" "purple unicorn.dat" do head -n 100 "$filename" | tail -n 20 done
It is simpler just to avoid using whitespaces (or other special characters) in filenames.
Going back to our original file copying problem, we can solve it using this loop:
for filename in *.jpg
do
cp $filename original-$filename
done
This loop runs the cp
command once for each filename.
The first time,
when $filename
expands to 1141.jpg
,
the shell executes:
cp 1141.jpg original-1141.jpg
The second time, the command is:
cp 1142.jpg original-1142.jpg
Since the cp
command does not normally produce any output, it’s hard to check
that the loop is doing the correct thing. By prefixing the command with echo
it is possible to see each command as it would be executed. The following diagram
shows what happens when the modified script is executed, and demonstrates how the
judicious use of echo
is a good debugging technique.
Add additonal metadata to the file names more descriptive. Let’s say we’re interested in catagorizing the images by whether they were origionally mounted in a glass enclosure. This is noted in the slide condition field. We’ll add the letter ‘G’ to slides that had the enclosuer and ‘N’ if they did not. We’ll use ‘X’ instead if there was uneven dye fading. 1411,1143,1148,1149 get G 1142 gets X Everything else gets N
There is probably a more efficient strategy - but start mby appending N to all files with. Then manually change the others to G and X.
Check that imagestats is present in your directory. If not, open a test editor and type
nano imagestats
echo $1 > $2
Nelle is now ready to process her data files. Since she’s still learning how to use the shell, she decides to build up the required commands in stages. Her first step is to make sure that she can select the right files — remember, these are ones whose names end in ‘G’ or ‘N’, rather than ‘X’. Starting from her home directory, Nelle types:
$ cd photos/19
$ for datafile in *[GN].jpg
> do
> echo $datafile
> done
Her next step is to decide
what to call the files that the imagestats
analysis program will create.
Prefixing each input file’s name with “stats” seems simple,
so she modifies her loop to do that:
$ for datafile in *[GN].jpg
> do
> echo $datafile stats-$datafile.txt
> done
She hasn’t actually run imagestats
yet,
but now she’s sure she can select the right files and generate the right output filenames.
Typing in commands over and over again is becoming tedious, though, and Nelle is worried about making mistakes, so instead of re-entering her loop, she presses the up arrow. In response, the shell redisplays the whole loop on one line (using semi-colons to separate the pieces):
$ for datafile in *[GN].jpg; do echo $datafile stats-$datafile.txt; done
Using the left arrow key,
Nelle backs up and changes the command echo
to bash imagestats
:
$ for datafile in *[GN].jpg; do bash imagestats $datafile stats-$datafile.txt; done
When she presses Enter,
the shell runs the modified command.
However, nothing appears to happen — there is no output.
After a moment, Nelle realizes that since her script doesn’t print anything to the screen any longer,
she has no idea whether it is running, much less how quickly.
She kills the running command by typing Ctrl-C
,
uses up-arrow to repeat the command,
and edits it to read:
$ for datafile in *[GN].txt; do echo $datafile; bash imagestats $datafile stats-$datafile; done
Beginning and End
We can move to the beginning of a line in the shell by typing
Ctrl-A
and to the end usingCtrl-E
.
When she runs her program now, it produces one line of output every five seconds or so:
1518 times 5 seconds,
divided by 60,
tells her that her script will take about two hours to run.
As a final check,
she opens another terminal window
and uses cat
to examine one of the output files.
It looks good,
so she decides to get some coffee and catch up on her reading.
Those Who Know History Can Choose to Repeat It
Another way to repeat previous work is to use the
history
command to get a list of the last few hundred commands that have been executed, and then to use!123
(where “123” is replaced by the command number) to repeat one of those commands. For example, if Nelle types this:$ history | tail -n 5
456 ls -l NENE0*.txt 457 rm stats-NENE01729B.txt.txt 458 bash imagestats NENE01729B.txt stats-NENE01729B.txt 459 ls -l NENE0*.txt 460 history
then she can re-run
imagestats
onNENE01729B.txt
simply by typing!458
.
Other History Commands
There are a number of other shortcut commands for getting at the history.
Ctrl-R
enters a history search mode “reverse-i-search” and looks for matches to the text you enter next. PressCtrl-R
again to cycle through matches.!!
retrieves the immediately preceding command (you may or may not find this more convenient than using the up-arrow)!$
retrieves the last word of the last command. That’s useful more often than you might expect: afterbash imagestats NENE01729B.txt stats-NENE01729B.txt
, you can typeless !$
to look at the filestats-NENE01729B.txt
, which is quicker than doing up-arrow and editing the command-line.
Variables in Loops
This exercise refers to the
data-shell/molecules
directory.ls
gives the following output:cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
What is the output of the following code?
for datafile in *.pdb do ls *.pdb done
Now, what is the output of the following code?
for datafile in *.pdb do ls $datafile done
Why do these two loops give different outputs?
Solution
The first code block gives the same output on each iteration through the loop. Bash expands the wildcard
*.pdb
within the loop body (as well as before the loop starts) to match all files ending in.pdb
and then lists them usingls
. The expanded loop would look like this:for datafile in cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb do ls cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb done
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
The second code block lists a different file on each loop iteration. The value of the
datafile
variable is evaluated using$datafile
, and then listed usingls
.cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
Saving to a File in a Loop - Part One
In the same directory, what is the effect of this loop?
for species in *.pdb do echo $species cat $species > alkanes.pdb done
- Prints
cubane.pdb
,ethane.pdb
,methane.pdb
,octane.pdb
,pentane.pdb
andpropane.pdb
, and the text frompropane.pdb
will be saved to a file calledalkanes.pdb
.- Prints
cubane.pdb
,ethane.pdb
, andmethane.pdb
, and the text from all three files would be concatenated and saved to a file calledalkanes.pdb
.- Prints
cubane.pdb
,ethane.pdb
,methane.pdb
,octane.pdb
, andpentane.pdb
, and the text frompropane.pdb
will be saved to a file calledalkanes.pdb
.- None of the above.
Solution
- The text from each file in turn gets written to the
alkanes.pdb
file. However, the file gets overwritten on each loop interation, so the final content ofalkanes.pdb
is the text from thepropane.pdb
file.
Saving to a File in a Loop - Part Two
In the same directory, what would be the output of the following loop?
for datafile in *.pdb do cat $datafile >> all.pdb done
- All of the text from
cubane.pdb
,ethane.pdb
,methane.pdb
,octane.pdb
, andpentane.pdb
would be concatenated and saved to a file calledall.pdb
.- The text from
ethane.pdb
will be saved to a file calledall.pdb
.- All of the text from
cubane.pdb
,ethane.pdb
,methane.pdb
,octane.pdb
,pentane.pdb
andpropane.pdb
would be concatenated and saved to a file calledall.pdb
.- All of the text from
cubane.pdb
,ethane.pdb
,methane.pdb
,octane.pdb
,pentane.pdb
andpropane.pdb
would be printed to the screen and saved to a file calledall.pdb
.Solution
3 is the correct answer.
>>
appends to a file, rather than overwriting it with the redirected output from a command. Given the output from thecat
command has been redirected, nothing is printed to the screen.
Limiting Sets of Files
In the same directory, what would be the output of the following loop?
for filename in c* do ls $filename done
- No files are listed.
- All files are listed.
- Only
cubane.pdb
,octane.pdb
andpentane.pdb
are listed.- Only
cubane.pdb
is listed.Solution
4 is the correct answer.
*
matches zero or more characters, so any file name starting with the letter c, followed by zero or more other characters will be matched.How would the output differ from using this command instead?
for filename in *c* do ls $filename done
- The same files would be listed.
- All the files are listed this time.
- No files are listed this time.
- The files
cubane.pdb
andoctane.pdb
will be listed.- Only the file
octane.pdb
will be listed.Solution
4 is the correct answer.
*
matches zero or more characters, so a file name with zero or more characters before a letter c and zero or more characters after the letter c will be matched.
Doing a Dry Run
A loop is a way to do many things at once — or to make many mistakes at once if it does the wrong thing. One way to check what a loop would do is to
echo
the commands it would run instead of actually running them.Suppose we want to preview the commands the following loop will execute without actually running those commands:
for file in *.pdb do analyze $file > analyzed-$file done
What is the difference between the two loops below, and which one would we want to run?
# Version 1 for file in *.pdb do echo analyze $file > analyzed-$file done
# Version 2 for file in *.pdb do echo "analyze $file > analyzed-$file" done
Solution
The second version is the one we want to run. This prints to screen everything enclosed in the quote marks, expanding the loop variable name because we have prefixed it with a dollar sign.
The first version redirects the output from the command
echo analyze $file
to a file,analyzed-$file
. A series of files is generated:cubane.pdb
,ethane.pdb
etc.Try both versions for yourself to see the output! Be sure to open the
analyzed-*.pdb
files to view their contents.
Nested Loops
Suppose we want to set up up a directory structure to organize some experiments measuring reaction rate constants with different compounds and different temperatures. What would be the result of the following code:
for species in cubane ethane methane do for temperature in 25 30 37 40 do mkdir $species-$temperature done done
Solution
We have a nested loop, i.e. contained within another loop, so for each species in the outer loop, the inner loop (the nested loop) iterates over the list of temperatures, and creates a new directory for each combination.
Try running the code for yourself to see which directories are created!
Key Points
A
for
loop repeats commands once for every thing in a list.Every
for
loop needs a variable to refer to the thing it is currently operating on.Use
$name
to expand a variable (i.e., get its value).${name}
can also be used.Do not use spaces, quotes, or wildcard characters such as ‘*’ or ‘?’ in filenames, as it complicates variable expansion.
Give files consistent names that are easy to match with wildcard patterns to make it easy to select them for looping.
Use the up-arrow key to scroll up through previous commands to edit and repeat them.
Use
Ctrl-R
to search through the previously entered commands.Use
history
to display recent commands, and!number
to repeat a command by number.